Quick Links

Re: Named arguments in function calls

From:	Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To:	Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc:	elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Named arguments in function calls
Date:	2004-01-26 16:03:45
Message-ID:	200401261703.45273.peter_e@gmx.net
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Rod Taylor wrote:
> If that was IS, then foo(x is 13) makes sense.

I like that syntax. For example

select interest(amount is 500.00, rate is 1.3)

is very readable, yet brief.

In response to

Re: Named arguments in function calls at 2004-01-25 22:32:31 from Rod Taylor

Responses

Re: Named arguments in function calls at 2004-01-26 16:22:28 from Tom Lane
Re: Named arguments in function calls at 2004-01-26 16:24:01 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Simon Riggs	2004-01-26 16:17:49	Re: cache control?
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2004-01-26 14:48:03	Re: what does it mean