From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Jan Wieck'" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'scott(dot)marlowe'" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "'Michael Brusser'" <michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com>, "'Postgresql Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cache control? |
Date: | 2004-01-26 16:17:49 |
Message-ID: | 000801c3e427$f2947960$5e00030a@LaptopDellXP |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jan,
I think we should suspend further discussion for now...in summary:
ARC Buffer management is an important new performance feature for 7.5;
the implementation is a good one and should have positive benefit for
everybody's workload. ARC will adapt to a variety of situations and has
been designed to allow Vacuum to avoid interfering with user
applications.
That's the important bit: The implementation notes are detailed; I've
read them a few times to ensure I've got it straight. I am confident
that the situation I described CAN exist with regard to multiple
concurrent queries performing full table scans upon a single large
table. Further debate on that point is continuing because of my poor
explanation of that situation; forgive me. Thanks very much for your
further explanations and examples.
I will take a more practical tack on this now: providing evidence of a
real query mix that exhibits the described properties and quantifying
the effects and their frequency. If it IS worth it, and I accept that it
may not be, I'll have a hack at the very specialised improvement I was
suggesting, for very specific workload types.
Best Regards
Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-26 16:22:28 | Re: Named arguments in function calls |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-01-26 16:03:45 | Re: Named arguments in function calls |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-26 16:45:49 | Re: Clarify libpq docs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-01-26 16:02:27 | Re: Clarify libpq docs |