Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question

Tom Lane wrote:
> Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> writes:
> > Or, maybe we'll just use the tas() implementation that already exists for
> > __i386__/__x86_64__ in s_lock.h. How did I miss that?
> > Move along. Nothing to see here.
>
> Actually, I was expecting you to complain that the s_lock.h coding is
> gcc-specific. Which compilers do we need to support on Windows?
>
> We might have to fall back to something comparable to the CVS-tip s_lock
> support for hppa: inline assembler in s_lock.h for gcc, and a separate
> assembly source file for use with vendor compiler(s).

MinGW only uses gcc so we are OK there.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073