Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, "'''pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org' ' '" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Date: 2004-01-23 04:55:32
Message-ID: 200401230455.i0N4tWJ01496@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> I'm not sure there's any need for
> >> src/backend/port/win32/sema.c at all.
>
> > (Do you have any idea on the historical
> > context of this code? I wondered as to, if we have no win32 port, why there
> > would be a seemingly good-to-go sema replacement?)
>
> [cvs is your friend...] It appears to have been added as part of the
> MinGW porting work last May. I don't have much faith in it; as far as
> I heard the MinGW port never got further than making the client-side
> code work, and so this file has no real-world testing.

Right, that is from PeerDirect's Win32 port, with a little cleanup. It
should work fine, or we can wack it around.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-23 04:56:08 Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-23 04:54:34 Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question