| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Murtagh <christopher(dot)murtagh(at)mcgill(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | postgres general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: restore error - language "plperlu" is not trusted |
| Date: | 2003-12-17 23:16:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200312180016.27980.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. The backend flat-out rejects all attempts at GRANT on untrusted
> languages, even if you are superuser and the grantee is too. I'm not
> totally sure about the rationale for that (Peter?)
Why would you need it? It's only going to create fuss about useless
functionality.
> but in any case
> pg_dump has evidently not gotten the word. If we think the backend's
> behavior is right then we'd better change pg_dump to suppress trying
> to GRANT permissions on untrusted languages.
There should not be any permissions, so there should be nothing to dump.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron St-Pierre | 2003-12-18 00:11:29 | Function Returning SETOF Problem |
| Previous Message | Matthew | 2003-12-17 23:15:17 | Re: Excel, OpenOffice and Postgres |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-18 00:48:24 | Re: restore error - language "plperlu" is not trusted |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-17 18:49:31 | Re: [PATCHES] Double Backslash example patch |