Re: VACUUM ANALYZE -vs- ANALYZE on an insert-only table.

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Matt Gordon <m(dot)gordon(at)f5(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE -vs- ANALYZE on an insert-only table.
Date: 2003-12-15 21:37:34
Message-ID: 20031215213734.GA27691@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 15:26:56 -0800,
Matt Gordon <m(dot)gordon(at)f5(dot)com> wrote:
> If I have a table that I only use for INSERTs and queries (no UPDATEs or DELETEs), is it enough to just run ANALYZE on the table instead of VACUUM ANALYZE? In other words, is running a VACUUM on a table useful if all that you're doing is INSERTing into it? My understanding of VACUUM is that it cleans up stale tuples that are left after UPDATEs and DELETEs.
>

You only need to vacuum if you do updates, deletes or when you need to
handle wrap around of transaction IDs (about every 10^9 transactions).

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-12-15 21:44:03 Re: PL/PgSQL composite parameter usage?
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2003-12-15 21:34:47 Re: Is it not datestyle that determines date format output?