Re: A question on the query planner

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Jared Carr <jared(at)89glass(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A question on the query planner
Date: 2003-12-03 23:17:37
Message-ID: 200312032317.hB3NHbY27219@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Define "no longer works well".
>
> > Well it seems to completely bar the use of a straight merge join between two
> > index scans:
>
> Hmmm ... [squints] ... it's not supposed to do that ... [digs] ... yeah,
> there's something busted here. Will get back to you ...

LOL, but I am not sure why. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jared Carr 2003-12-03 23:21:50 Re: A question on the query planner
Previous Message Fred Moyer 2003-12-03 22:35:45 Re: Has anyone run on the new G5 yet