From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Call from Info World |
Date: | 2003-11-21 00:01:08 |
Message-ID: | 200311210001.hAL018v24483@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 17:07, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 15:46, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > Bruce,
> > >
> >
> > Here is the article:
> > http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/20/HNpostgre_1.html
> >
> >
> > > > Interestingly, in trying to think of a visible open source project that
> > > > isn't controlled by a company, I couldn't think of one. Mozilla, PHP,
> > > > Apache, MySQL, even perhaps Linux have one very visible company that has
> > > > significant control over the project, while we do not. Is there a good
> > > > example someone can think of?
> > >
> > > Perl, amanda, Python, OpenACS and LTSP come to mind.
>
> > Hmm... I don't see amanda, openacs, or ltsp all that visible to the
> > greater tech (ie. commercially driven) community, and Perl and Python
> > aren't really the same; there not a piece of software like postgresql.
>
> How about not-for-profits? FreeBSD, KDE?
I mentioned FreeBSD but that didn't seem to register with him. I doubt
KDE would either.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-21 00:03:43 | Re: Call from Info World |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-21 00:00:33 | Re: Call from Info World |