| From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Call from Info World |
| Date: | 2003-11-20 22:15:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1069366535.26521.43.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 17:07, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 15:46, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Bruce,
> >
>
> Here is the article:
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/20/HNpostgre_1.html
>
>
> > > Interestingly, in trying to think of a visible open source project that
> > > isn't controlled by a company, I couldn't think of one. Mozilla, PHP,
> > > Apache, MySQL, even perhaps Linux have one very visible company that has
> > > significant control over the project, while we do not. Is there a good
> > > example someone can think of?
> >
> > Perl, amanda, Python, OpenACS and LTSP come to mind.
> Hmm... I don't see amanda, openacs, or ltsp all that visible to the
> greater tech (ie. commercially driven) community, and Perl and Python
> aren't really the same; there not a piece of software like postgresql.
How about not-for-profits? FreeBSD, KDE?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-20 23:52:28 | Re: Call from Info World |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-20 22:07:31 | Re: Call from Info World |