Re: pg_ctl

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, offshore(at)mail(dot)commandprompt(dot)com, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Date: 2003-11-20 03:58:03
Message-ID: 200311200358.hAK3w3a13774@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I am dissapointed in the amount of time that pg_ctl has taken. The
> > programmer is at 16 hours.
> > pg_ctl is just a shell script, how hard can it actually be to convert it
> > to c?
>
> Huh? Is there a reason you posted this here? Are you paying this guy to
> convert it for you? If so, why aren't you emailing him, and not us?
> *confused look*

I assume he is asking if it should be a hard job --- I didn't think so
myself, especially if he uses initdb.c as a guide.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: pg_ctl at 2003-11-19 20:24:16 from Marc G. Fournier

Responses

  • Re: pg_ctl at 2003-11-20 04:16:51 from Joshua D. Drake

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-20 04:16:51 Re: pg_ctl
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-20 01:17:29 Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the