Re: pg_ctl

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: offshore(at)mail(dot)commandprompt(dot)com, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Date: 2003-11-19 20:24:16
Message-ID: 20031119162343.M731@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> I am dissapointed in the amount of time that pg_ctl has taken. The
> programmer is at 16 hours.
> pg_ctl is just a shell script, how hard can it actually be to convert it
> to c?

Huh? Is there a reason you posted this here? Are you paying this guy to
convert it for you? If so, why aren't you emailing him, and not us?
*confused look*

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

  • pg_ctl at 2003-11-19 20:18:18 from Joshua D. Drake

Responses

  • Re: pg_ctl at 2003-11-20 03:58:03 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message William Yu 2003-11-19 20:24:27 Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-19 20:18:18 pg_ctl