Re: CSS and XHTML

----- Original-Nachricht -----
Von: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
An: Andreas GrabmXller <webmaster(at)letzplay(dot)de>
CC: scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com
Datum: Sunday, November 09, 2003 07:59 PM
Betreff: [pgsql-www] CSS and XHTML

> On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Andreas GrabmXller wrote:
>
> > Well, the new code isn't really existing yet... there are just the two
> > test.htm files but nobody has decided yet if we do it that way (I think
> > nobody has even decided if we merge the sites?)...
>
> Actually, I thought we had decided that the only two we couldn't merge in
> were gborg and techdocs? And, I tend to be of the opinion that if nobody
> pipe's up negative, go with as proposed ... and the only comment I saw go
> about the design was from Dave, and it appeared positive :)

You are right, I just don't know who decides what here ;) And I don't know who is responsible for the advocacy and developer sites...

> Correct me if I'm wrong here, but when I looked at it, all I saw was that
> the left menu 'bar' was extended to pull in the various sites? I didn't
> see anything jump out at me as far as changes were concerned, beyond that
> ... or did I miss something?

Yes, principially you are right, it's the new menu plus the current-versions-box on the top right and maybe the new index page.

If we decide to do this changes it might be the easiest way if Michael takes the current CVS source and applies the changes in test2.htm in a XHTML compatible way...

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Andreas Grabmüller

--
LetzPlay.de
| Freemail: http://www.letzplay.de/mail
| Forenhosting: http://www.letzplay.de/foren
>From pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Sun Nov 9 16:10:29 2003
X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C8350D1B509; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 20:09:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 44386-03; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 16:09:12 -0400 (AST)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 088CED1B53F; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 16:09:11 -0400 (AST)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 417E2342E7; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 16:06:58 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 405B434299; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 16:06:58 -0400 (AST)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 16:06:58 -0400 (AST)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
X-X-Sender: scrappy(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org
To: Andreas GrabmXller <webmaster(at)letzplay(dot)de>
Cc: scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,
grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com
Subject: Re: CSS and XHTML
In-Reply-To: <20031109194935(dot)9513(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de>
Message-ID: <20031109160514(dot)Q727(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
References: <504D1003-12C1-11D8-A551-0005029FC1A7(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
<20031109164601(dot)1629(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de> <20031109140248(dot)X54672(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
<20031109182518(dot)5466(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de> <20031109143540(dot)Q12394(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
<20031109185407(dot)6751(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de> <20031109145157(dot)G12394(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
<20031109194935(dot)9513(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200311/101
X-Sequence-Number: 2748

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Andreas GrabmXller wrote:

> You are right, I just don't know who decides what here ;) And I don't
> know who is responsible for the advocacy and developer sites...

I'd say that Advocacy falls under Josh et al ... developer tends to be an
enigma (nobody really maintains it) ....

As for 'who decides' ... its more by consensus ... so unless you get
negative feedback, go with 'nobody is against it, so proceed' ... if you
waited for everyone to give feedback and agreement, you could be sitting
on it for months :)