Re: CSS and XHTML

----- Original-Nachricht -----
Von: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
An: Andreas GrabmXller <webmaster(at)letzplay(dot)de>
CC: scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com
Datum: Sunday, November 09, 2003 07:42 PM
Betreff: [pgsql-www] CSS and XHTML

> On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Andreas GrabmXller wrote:
>
> > Yes, but if the code in CVS is out of date and hast to be redone for the
> > new site structure, it does not make sense to update it to XHTML ;)
>
> True, but if there is someway of Micheal being able to access the new
> code, so that he can update it as its being developed, instead of waiting
> until the end?

Well, the new code isn't really existing yet... there are just the two test.htm files but nobody has decided yet if we do it that way (I think nobody has even decided if we merge the sites?)...

> I may be thinking of something else, but isn't xHTML just
> a more strict HTML? (ie. <TD>'s *must* have matching </TD>'s)
>
> Michael?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Andreas Grabmüller

--
LetzPlay.de
| Freemail: http://www.letzplay.de/mail
| Forenhosting: http://www.letzplay.de/foren
>From pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Sun Nov 9 14:57:53 2003
X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D8208D1B50C; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:57:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 27013-07; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:57:22 -0400 (AST)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 33DCDD1B509; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:57:21 -0400 (AST)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 17337350E0; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:55:08 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1629335054; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:55:08 -0400 (AST)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 14:55:08 -0400 (AST)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
X-X-Sender: scrappy(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org
To: Andreas GrabmXller <webmaster(at)letzplay(dot)de>
Cc: scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,
grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com
Subject: Re: CSS and XHTML
In-Reply-To: <20031109185407(dot)6751(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de>
Message-ID: <20031109145157(dot)G12394(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
References: <504D1003-12C1-11D8-A551-0005029FC1A7(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
<20031109164601(dot)1629(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de> <20031109140248(dot)X54672(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
<20031109182518(dot)5466(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de> <20031109143540(dot)Q12394(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
<20031109185407(dot)6751(dot)qmail(at)osiris(dot)gamecrashnet(dot)de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200311/99
X-Sequence-Number: 2746

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Andreas GrabmXller wrote:

> Well, the new code isn't really existing yet... there are just the two
> test.htm files but nobody has decided yet if we do it that way (I think
> nobody has even decided if we merge the sites?)...

Actually, I thought we had decided that the only two we couldn't merge in
were gborg and techdocs? And, I tend to be of the opinion that if nobody
pipe's up negative, go with as proposed ... and the only comment I saw go
about the design was from Dave, and it appeared positive :)

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but when I looked at it, all I saw was that
the left menu 'bar' was extended to pull in the various sites? I didn't
see anything jump out at me as far as changes were concerned, beyond that
... or did I miss something?