| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas GrabmXller <webmaster(at)letzplay(dot)de>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: CSS and XHTML |
| Date: | 2003-11-09 21:28:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20031109172557.U727@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Marc, Andreas:
>
> > > You are right, I just don't know who decides what here ;) And I don't
> > > know who is responsible for the advocacy and developer sites...
> >
> > I'd say that Advocacy falls under Josh et al ... developer tends to be an
> > enigma (nobody really maintains it) ....
>
> Robert is the lead on Advocacy. I've no objections to making Advocacy
> the "press" page for a united site. However, Robert may have some
> objections, I don't know. Robert, FWIW, taking this united approach
> would silence some of the objections of Peter and some of the other core
> Hackers who don't like advocacy in its current form.
Just a side note ... even with a 'merged site', there should be no reason
why we can't have 'advocacy.postgresql.org' point to the lead page for
that section ... same with developer ... I think the thing I don't like
about the current advocacy site is that it doesn't have the 'glitz' that
one generally sees from a marketing perspective ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-09 21:37:52 | Re: CSS and XHTML |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-09 21:05:33 | Re: CSS and XHTML |