Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Date: 2003-11-07 14:21:12
Message-ID: 200311071421.hA7ELCd26356@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:08:57PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > I think that list is a pretty dumb idea in the first place. We have a
> > list of developers with company names next to them. Let readers make
> > their own recognition evaluation.
>
> I'm not sure that's all it's for. Every time we talk about using
> Postgres, people want to know who else uses it. It's really strange,
> but for some reason, people seem to believe that a product isn't any
> good unless a large number of people are already using it, and that
> it _is_ good if a large number of people do use it. (I guess the idea
> is that all those Windows users can't be wrong. Oh, wait. . .)

You have heard the term "first adopters". These people want to be
second adopters. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-11-07 14:29:46 Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-07 14:12:50 Re: Changes to Contributor List

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-11-07 14:29:46 Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-07 14:12:50 Re: Changes to Contributor List