| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Expressional Indexes |
| Date: | 2003-10-22 20:22:26 |
| Message-ID: | 200310221322.26013.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-sql |
Tom,
> Mainly that "expressional" is a made-up word.
So? We're in the tech biz, Tom. New-coined words are expected. And that
way nobody will expect it to mean something else, since we made it up.
-- H. Dumpty, Q.E.D.
> I have been considering using "calculated index" or "computed index"
> but dunno if that really conveys anything.
Well, "Expression Indexes" is the most accurate. Or "Expression-Based
Indexes."
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-22 20:27:25 | Re: advice |
| Previous Message | Andrei Ivanov | 2003-10-22 19:58:12 | advice |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-22 20:25:18 | Re: Query planner: current_* vs. explicit date |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-22 19:44:58 | Re: Expressional Indexes |