| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Michael Glaesmann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Expressional Indexes |
| Date: | 2003-10-22 19:44:58 |
| Message-ID: | 18349.1066851898@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-sql |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm not particularly happy with the phrase "expressional index", and
>> would like to think of something else to use before the 7.4 docs go
>> final. Any ideas?
> Hmmm ... well, actually, I like "Expressional Indexes". What's wrong
> with it?
Mainly that "expressional" is a made-up word.
I have been considering using "calculated index" or "computed index"
but dunno if that really conveys anything.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrei Ivanov | 2003-10-22 19:58:12 | advice |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-22 19:39:58 | Re: Expressional Indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-22 20:22:26 | Re: Expressional Indexes |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-22 19:39:58 | Re: Expressional Indexes |