From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.4 compatibility question |
Date: | 2003-10-22 05:08:04 |
Message-ID: | 200310220508.h9M584f23271@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 00:41, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > It would be pretty strange to use those as a default --- I am not
> > > inclined to mention it in the release notes --- we don't mention every
> > > change, only significant ones.
> >
> > Personally, I think that's a fairly silly policy!
>
> I agree -- documenting possible areas of incompatibility is important,
> and I would prefer that we err on the side of mentioning too much,
> rather than too little.
Docs updated to include 'today':
<listitem><para> <literal>'now'</literal> will no longer work as a
column default; <function>now()</> or
<function>CURRENT_TIMESTAMP</> should be used instead</para></listitem>
<listitem><para> <literal>'today'</literal> will no longer work as
a column default; <function>CURRENT_DATE</>
should be used instead</para></listitem>
As far as yesterday/tomorrow, I think anyone using that will realize
that if 'today' doesn't work, those will not either. Sure, I like to be
complete too, but at a certain point it becomes overload and people
can't process it. Part of the reason the release notes are read is
because they are _readable_, or as readable was we can make +300
changes.
Do you think I include every user-visible change in the release notes?
It would be 2-3x longer, and probably not more useful.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-22 06:37:57 | Re: 7.4 compatibility question |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-22 05:00:32 | Re: 7.4 compatibility question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-10-22 05:55:28 | Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-22 05:00:32 | Re: 7.4 compatibility question |