Re: 7.4 compatibility question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Date: 2003-10-22 05:00:32
Message-ID: 200310220500.h9M50WQ22733@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > It would be pretty strange to use those as a default --- I am not
> > inclined to mention it in the release notes --- we don't mention every
> > change, only significant ones.
>
> Personally, I think that's a fairly silly policy! How does it hurt us
> to mention it and you just know that someone, somewhere, is doing it...

The release notes are already 550 lines --- adding the mention of
something almost no one uses doesn't make sense --- if we did that, the
list might be 1000 lines and more unreadable. Same logic goes for the
list of changes --- I only mention user-visible changes, in most cases.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 05:08:04 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-22 04:50:58 Re: 7.4 compatibility question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 05:08:04 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-22 04:50:58 Re: 7.4 compatibility question