Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
Date: 2003-10-21 03:16:14
Message-ID: 200310210316.h9L3GET10407@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > I'm inclined to do it --- I don't get the sense that too many people
> > have loaded large databases into 7.4 beta installations --- but if
> > anyone wants to object now is the time.
>
> Oops, I already did it. But if someone objects, it's an easy change back.

I guess my question would be how many people are using information
schemas vs. have loaded databases they don't want to reload.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-21 03:18:37 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/main/main.c backend/t ...
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-21 03:15:43 Re: multi-backend psql