Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
Date: 2003-10-21 04:16:55
Message-ID: 20031021011619.R23755@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> > > I'm inclined to do it --- I don't get the sense that too many people
> > > have loaded large databases into 7.4 beta installations --- but if
> > > anyone wants to object now is the time.
> >
> > Oops, I already did it. But if someone objects, it's an easy change back.
>
> I guess my question would be how many people are using information
> schemas vs. have loaded databases they don't want to reload.

We are still in beta, not RC ... why is this even an issue?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-10-21 04:25:47 Re: multi-backend psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-21 04:13:31 Re: A couple of TODO notes