| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... |
| Date: | 2003-10-21 03:13:47 |
| Message-ID: | 200310210313.h9L3Dlg10074@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > What about bumping the libpq version?
>
> After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
> major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
> only additions). That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
> was incorrect. Never mind ...
Or, should I say, "Glad we are OK with current libpq version numbers".
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-21 03:15:43 | Re: multi-backend psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-21 03:13:19 | Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... |