Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
Date: 2003-10-21 00:43:54
Message-ID: 17109.1066697034@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> What about bumping the libpq version?

After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
only additions). That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
was incorrect. Never mind ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-21 01:26:12 multi-backend psql
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-21 00:38:49 Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...