Re: Which is faster SQL or PL/PGSQL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Michael Pohl <pgsql(at)newtopia(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, "George A(dot)J" <jinujosein(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Which is faster SQL or PL/PGSQL
Date: 2003-10-20 20:58:38
Message-ID: 200310201358.38318.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Tom,

> AFAICS, the whole point of EXECUTE in plpgsql is that it doesn't take
> any shortcuts, and so the answer to Josh's question can only be "don't
> use EXECUTE"...

Yeah, that's what I thought, I was just hoping for some low-hanging fruit.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Clint Stotesbery 2003-10-20 21:20:32 converting an oracle procedure to postgres
Previous Message Ewald Geschwinde 2003-10-20 19:52:37 Re: [postgres] Deutsche PostgreSQL-Mailingliste unter postgresql.org