Re: PostgreSQL Scalable ?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Scalable ?
Date: 2003-10-10 17:41:09
Message-ID: 200310101041.09459.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Herve'

> One other small question ... Does PostgreSQL is scalable ?

Given that we have several members of our community with 2TB databases, and
one entitiy with a 32TB database, I'd say yes.

> I mean ... is it possible to have two servers, one rack of disks connected
> to the 2 servers to get access in same time to the same database ?

Not at this time, no.

> Other point is there any possibilties to make servers clusters with
> PostgreSQL ? If no why ? If yes how ? ;o)

Only via replication or creative use of DBLink. Nobody has yet offered to
build us database server clustering, which would be very nice to have, but
would require a substantial investment from a corporate sponsor.

> To be clear I would like to make a system with PostgreSQL able to answer
> about 70 000 000 requests by day (Internet services) ... I'm not sure about
> the server configuration I have to make.

That sounds doable on proper hardware with good tuning. Might I suggest
that you consider hiring a consultant and start from there? I believe that
Afilias Limited (www.afilias.info) has the requisite experience in Europe.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-10 17:43:10 Re: One or more processor ?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-10 17:34:52 Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL