Re: int1?

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: int1?
Date: 2003-10-09 17:54:53
Message-ID: 20031009175453.GM86551@perrin.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > > Is there any date type that can be used for 0-255 values? Like
> > > an "int1" or byte column.
> >
> > A SMALLINT is two bytes on disk, use "char" instead. This is a hidden
>
> However "char" has some serious deficiencies IIRC, such as the fact
> that there's no int<->"char" casts and it's standard I/O format is
> characters. You can use ascii and chr to get around some of that,
> but it's ugly.

*nods* I have explicit casts everywhere when dealing with "char" and
it's far from being elegant or clean.

>
> > goodie in PostgreSQL and one that I wish was exposed via a more
> > conventional syntax (*hint hint*).
>
> If we were going to do that I think we'd be better off making a new
> type and leaving "char" alone.
>

You won't hear any disagreements from me on this one. I've
sufficiently abused "char" as a 1 byte storage field and would love to
see an int1 or tinyint datatype added to cover this situation. -sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

  • Re: int1? at 2003-10-09 14:59:55 from Stephan Szabo

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2003-10-09 17:56:31 Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs.
Previous Message Együd Csaba 2003-10-09 17:50:54 Re: How to delete unclosed connections?