Re: int1?

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: int1?
Date: 2003-10-09 14:59:55
Message-ID: 20031009075650.M61245@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote:

> > Is there any date type that can be used for 0-255
> > values? Like an "int1" or byte column.
>
> A SMALLINT is two bytes on disk, use "char" instead. This is a hidden

However "char" has some serious deficiencies IIRC, such as the fact that
there's no int<->"char" casts and it's standard I/O format is characters.
You can use ascii and chr to get around some of that, but it's ugly.

> goodie in PostgreSQL and one that I wish was exposed via a more
> conventional syntax (*hint hint*).

If we were going to do that I think we'd be better off making a new type
and leaving "char" alone.

In response to

  • Re: int1? at 2003-10-09 08:19:09 from Sean Chittenden

Responses

  • Re: int1? at 2003-10-09 17:54:53 from Sean Chittenden

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-09 15:00:49 Re: How to delete unclosed connections?
Previous Message Jonathan Bartlett 2003-10-09 14:59:51 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)