| From: | Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres low end processing. |
| Date: | 2003-10-03 17:52:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20031003195238.16fc1229.svb@ucs.co.za |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:32:00 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
=> What exactly is failing? And what's the platform, anyway?
Nothing is really failing atm, except the funds for better
hardware. JBOSS and some other servers need to be
run on these machines, along with linux, which will be
a minimal RH >= 7.2 with kernel 2.4.21
(Any better suggestions here?)
In this case, whatever is the least amount of memory
postgres can run on, is what is needed. So this is still
a kind of feasibility study. Of course, it will still be thoroughly
tested, if it turns out to be possible. (Which I know it is, but not how)
Regards
Stef
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Relaxin | 2003-10-03 18:06:11 | Re: PostgreSQL Beta4 Tag'd and Bundle'd ... |
| Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-10-03 17:52:08 | Re: Tsearch2 Causing Backend Crash |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Lebedev | 2003-10-03 18:04:23 | Re: TPC-R benchmarks |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-03 17:21:50 | Re: TPC-R benchmarks |