Re: Postgres low end processing.

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres low end processing.
Date: 2003-10-03 18:34:00
Message-ID: 1065206040.1513.98.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 12:52, Stef wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:32:00 -0400
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> => What exactly is failing? And what's the platform, anyway?
>
> Nothing is really failing atm, except the funds for better
> hardware. JBOSS and some other servers need to be
> run on these machines, along with linux, which will be
> a minimal RH >= 7.2 with kernel 2.4.21
> (Any better suggestions here?)
>
> In this case, whatever is the least amount of memory
> postgres can run on, is what is needed. So this is still
> a kind of feasibility study. Of course, it will still be thoroughly
> tested, if it turns out to be possible. (Which I know it is, but not how)

JBOSS, PostgreSQL & 2.4.21 all on a computer w/ 8MB RAM? A 486 or
*very* low end Pentium?

It'll thrash (in the literal sense) the page files. *No* work
will get done.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA

"...always eager to extend a friendly claw"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Network Administrator 2003-10-03 18:44:06 Re: administration with pgaccess
Previous Message Network Administrator 2003-10-03 18:32:00 Re: Type of application that use PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-10-03 19:04:52 Re: Postgres low end processing.
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-03 18:08:48 Re: Postgres low end processing.