From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres low end processing. |
Date: | 2003-10-03 18:34:00 |
Message-ID: | 1065206040.1513.98.camel@haggis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 12:52, Stef wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:32:00 -0400
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> => What exactly is failing? And what's the platform, anyway?
>
> Nothing is really failing atm, except the funds for better
> hardware. JBOSS and some other servers need to be
> run on these machines, along with linux, which will be
> a minimal RH >= 7.2 with kernel 2.4.21
> (Any better suggestions here?)
>
> In this case, whatever is the least amount of memory
> postgres can run on, is what is needed. So this is still
> a kind of feasibility study. Of course, it will still be thoroughly
> tested, if it turns out to be possible. (Which I know it is, but not how)
JBOSS, PostgreSQL & 2.4.21 all on a computer w/ 8MB RAM? A 486 or
*very* low end Pentium?
It'll thrash (in the literal sense) the page files. *No* work
will get done.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA
"...always eager to extend a friendly claw"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Network Administrator | 2003-10-03 18:44:06 | Re: administration with pgaccess |
Previous Message | Network Administrator | 2003-10-03 18:32:00 | Re: Type of application that use PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-03 19:04:52 | Re: Postgres low end processing. |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-03 18:08:48 | Re: Postgres low end processing. |