From: | Cyrille Chepelov <cyrille(at)chepelov(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for |
Date: | 2003-09-25 18:22:18 |
Message-ID: | 20030925182218.GB21627@chepelov.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Le Thu, Sep 25, 2003, à 12:57:09PM -0400, Bruce Momjian a écrit:
> Keith Bottner wrote:
> > Typically variables that you want to be per-thread are stored in what
> > Microsoft calls Thread Local Storage (TLS). Variables that you want shared
> > you can just treat as globals and statics with the appropriate threading
> > synchronization primitives. With Windows 2000 and later you have up to 1088
> > TLS locations that you can use, of course these can be pointers to memory
> > which can store whatever you want.
> Goes GCC on Windows support TLS, or only Microsoft compilers?
Well, for sure Borland C++ Builder has support for TLS. Gcc too
apparently:
http://www-es.fernuni-hagen.de/cgi-bin/info2html?(gcc)Thread-Local
Doesn't seem specially hard to use, I guess the primary factor will be
the amount of static data currently used and how much of it should be
sent to the shared and non-shared bins.
-- Cyrille
--
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | markw | 2003-09-25 18:44:19 | Re: Is this a commit problem? |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-09-25 17:48:56 | Re: pgsql procedures?? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith Bottner | 2003-09-25 19:16:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-25 17:03:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes |