| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Keith Bottner <kbottner(at)comcast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Claudio Natoli'" <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, "'Robert Treat'" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for |
| Date: | 2003-09-25 16:57:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200309251657.h8PGv9317566@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Keith Bottner wrote:
> Typically variables that you want to be per-thread are stored in what
> Microsoft calls Thread Local Storage (TLS). Variables that you want shared
> you can just treat as globals and statics with the appropriate threading
> synchronization primitives. With Windows 2000 and later you have up to 1088
> TLS locations that you can use, of course these can be pointers to memory
> which can store whatever you want.
Goes GCC on Windows support TLS, or only Microsoft compilers?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | markw | 2003-09-25 17:00:02 | Re: Is this a commit problem? |
| Previous Message | Zhen Yang | 2003-09-25 16:55:48 | Re: Question on adding new indexes to Postgresql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-25 17:03:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes |
| Previous Message | Keith Bottner | 2003-09-25 16:50:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows) |