From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Moved simple_prompt()/sprompt.c |
Date: | 2003-08-08 14:28:32 |
Message-ID: | 200308081428.h78ESW409098@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >> If a file is needed by three non-backend directories, /port seems to be
> >> the proper place for it.
>
> > src/port is intended for replacement implementations of standard library
> > functions.
>
> I concur, src/port is *not* the right place. src/port is for stuff that
> is platform-dependent.
Yes, thread.c, path.c, and sprompt.c should be in utils, but how do I do
that? Utils seems to be a place things are pulled from, rather than a
library that goes with every link.
Is it worth creating another library that acts just like /port but is
called utils, or should we just rename the directory to portutils?
I am looking to move fmtId() over to port too so psql can use it. It is
already used by pg_dump, and /scripts.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-08 14:29:00 | Re: poorly written builtin functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-08 14:11:07 | Re: TODO items |