Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections
Date: 2003-07-19 00:19:01
Message-ID: 20030719001901.GX24507@perrin.int.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > > There are 1000's of references to postgresql and connection pooling.
> > >
> > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=pooling+postgresql
> > >
> > > Maybe somthing there will work.
> >
> > Those are all application level connection pooling links. I'm
> > thinking about something that's done on the database side like ORA
> > Listener and passes active connections back to the backend that way
> > it's completely transparent and applies to every libpq app regardless
> > of the language, application, etc.
> >
> > -sc
>
> Perhaps this is the answer? I've never used it, but I remember
> seeing ti on freshmeat.net.
>
> http://sqlrelay.sourceforge.net/

Very cool... too bad rudiments (prerequisit) doesn't compile with
newer versions of GCC and this requires you to develop your apps using
sqlrelay's API and not libpq.... though it's better than nothing. :)
-sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-07-19 00:56:50 Re: What about a comp.databases.postgresql usenet newsgroup
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2003-07-19 00:06:35 Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-19 01:19:55 Re: dblink_ora - a first shot on Oracle ...
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2003-07-19 00:06:35 Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections