| From: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections |
| Date: | 2003-07-19 00:06:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200307181706.36090.jdavis-pgsql@empires.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 18 July 2003 01:28 pm, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > There are 1000's of references to postgresql and connection pooling.
> >
> > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=pooling+postgresql
> >
> > Maybe somthing there will work.
>
> Those are all application level connection pooling links. I'm
> thinking about something that's done on the database side like ORA
> Listener and passes active connections back to the backend that way
> it's completely transparent and applies to every libpq app regardless
> of the language, application, etc.
>
> -sc
Perhaps this is the answer? I've never used it, but I remember seeing ti on
freshmeat.net.
http://sqlrelay.sourceforge.net/
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-07-19 00:19:01 | Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gould | 2003-07-18 22:50:37 | Re: Access 97 DB to Postgres Migration Questions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-07-19 00:19:01 | Re: Urgent: 10K or more connections |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-18 21:47:37 | Re: commiters log |