From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Brian Tarbox <btarbox(at)theworld(dot)com> |
Cc: | Rafal Kedziorski <rafcio(at)polonium(dot)de>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
Date: | 2003-07-04 13:50:26 |
Message-ID: | 20030704214951.L12459-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> I recently took a system from MySQL to Postgres. Same HW, SW, same data.
> The major operations where moderately complex queries (joins on 8 tables).
>
> The results we got was that Postgres was fully 3 times slower than MySql.
> We were on this list a fair bit looking for answers and tried all the
> standard answers. It was still much much much slower.
I have never found a query in MySQL that was faster than one in
PostgreSQL.
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-04 13:59:13 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-07-04 13:45:30 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-04 13:59:13 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-04 13:49:25 | Re: any body using Solaris8 with postgresql 7.3.3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-04 13:50:50 | Re: cvs version compile error |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-07-04 13:49:22 | Re: How to submit Tsearch V2 ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-04 13:59:13 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-07-04 13:45:30 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |