| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Brian Tarbox" <btarbox(at)theworld(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Rafal Kedziorski" <rafcio(at)polonium(dot)de>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Date: | 2003-07-04 13:59:13 |
| Message-ID: | 15241.1057327153@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
"Brian Tarbox" <btarbox(at)theworld(dot)com> writes:
> I recently took a system from MySQL to Postgres. Same HW, SW, same data.
> The major operations where moderately complex queries (joins on 8 tables).
> The results we got was that Postgres was fully 3 times slower than MySql.
> We were on this list a fair bit looking for answers and tried all the
> standard answers. It was still much much much slower.
Could we see the details? It's not very fair to not give us a chance to
learn about problems.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian Tarbox | 2003-07-04 14:07:46 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-07-04 13:50:26 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian Tarbox | 2003-07-04 14:07:46 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-07-04 13:50:26 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian Tarbox | 2003-07-04 14:07:46 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-04 13:50:50 | Re: cvs version compile error |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian Tarbox | 2003-07-04 14:07:46 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-07-04 13:50:26 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |