Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: 2003-07-04 19:20:59
Message-ID: 200307041220.59185.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tom,

> I am about to propose a patch that will cause the default shared_buffers
> to be more realistic, say 1000, on machines where the kernel will allow
> it. Not sure if people will let me get away with applying it
> post-feature-freeze, but if so that would change the terms of this
> debate noticeably.

+1

--
-Josh Berkus

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-07-04 19:29:38 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-04 19:18:43 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-07-04 19:29:38 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-04 19:18:43 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-07-04 19:29:37 Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-04 19:18:43 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-07-04 19:29:38 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-04 19:18:43 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL