Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: 2003-07-04 19:29:38
Message-ID: 1057346977.40425.108.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

> I am about to propose a patch that will cause the default shared_buffers
> to be more realistic, say 1000, on machines where the kernel will allow
> it. Not sure if people will let me get away with applying it
> post-feature-freeze, but if so that would change the terms of this
> debate noticeably.

It's not a feature change, it's a bug fix -- bug being an oversight.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message johnnnnnn 2003-07-04 20:39:57 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-04 19:20:59 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-07-04 19:45:04 Re: any body using Solaris8 with postgresql 7.3.3
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-04 19:20:59 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2003-07-04 20:31:35 Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-04 19:29:37 Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message johnnnnnn 2003-07-04 20:39:57 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-04 19:20:59 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL