Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)

That was my feeling, but the author wasn't sure about the patch either,
hence it was backed out.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > > Patch applied. Thanks.
> > >
> > > > Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> > > >> Attached is a patch that provides *VERY* limited support for multiple slave
> > > >> servers. I haven't tested it very well, so use at your own risk (and I
> > > >> recommend against using it in production).
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > It sounded to me like that patch was intended for comment, not for
> > > application.
> >
> > He said it wasn't all he wanted to do with the code, but that it did
> > work. With so few rserv patches, it seems like something we should get
> > in, but maybe not? Other comments? I am not sure myself.
>
> Considering how many ppl have commented in the past how rserv was broken
> anyway ... ? I'd say it can't hurt anything ...
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073