From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael A Nachbaur <mike(at)nachbaur(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta) |
Date: | 2003-06-25 23:33:04 |
Message-ID: | 20030625203243.O5387@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Patch applied. Thanks.
> >
> > > Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> > >> Attached is a patch that provides *VERY* limited support for multiple slave
> > >> servers. I haven't tested it very well, so use at your own risk (and I
> > >> recommend against using it in production).
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > It sounded to me like that patch was intended for comment, not for
> > application.
>
> He said it wasn't all he wanted to do with the code, but that it did
> work. With so few rserv patches, it seems like something we should get
> in, but maybe not? Other comments? I am not sure myself.
Considering how many ppl have commented in the past how rserv was broken
anyway ... ? I'd say it can't hurt anything ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-06-25 23:35:47 | Re: Feature freeze and the great elog changeover |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-25 23:30:17 | Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables |