| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mendola Gaetano <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Henry House <hajhouse(at)houseag(dot)uce-not-wanted-here(dot)com>, Anagha Joshi <ajoshi(at)nulinkinc(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Timestamp of insertion of the row. |
| Date: | 2003-06-16 10:07:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20030616100713.GA27028@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:34:46 +0200,
Mendola Gaetano <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> wrote:
> "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
> > You still may not want to use timeofday even for long transactions.
> > It depends on what the data really means to you.
>
> The OP was looking for a way to know the time of a row insertion,
> not the time of the transaction inside where the row was inserted.
And what exactly does that mean? My point was that there are a number
of different things this could mean. Once that question is answered
then it is possibl to give more precise solutions to the problem.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mendola Gaetano | 2003-06-16 10:12:10 | Re: Timestamp of insertion of the row. |
| Previous Message | Christian Brosig | 2003-06-16 09:32:24 | Error: Relation "pg_rel_check" does not exist |