| From: | "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
| Cc: | "Henry House" <hajhouse(at)houseag(dot)uce-not-wanted-here(dot)com>, "Anagha Joshi" <ajoshi(at)nulinkinc(dot)com>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Timestamp of insertion of the row. |
| Date: | 2003-06-16 10:12:10 |
| Message-ID: | 00b701c333ef$bfd34440$152aa8c0@GMENDOLA2 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
> Mendola Gaetano <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> wrote:
> > "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
> > > You still may not want to use timeofday even for long transactions.
> > > It depends on what the data really means to you.
> >
> > The OP was looking for a way to know the time of a row insertion,
> > not the time of the transaction inside where the row was inserted.
>
> And what exactly does that mean? My point was that there are a number
> of different things this could mean. Once that question is answered
> then it is possibl to give more precise solutions to the problem.
I totally agree with you.
Gaetano
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anagha Joshi | 2003-06-16 10:15:28 | Re: Timestamp of insertion of the row. |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-06-16 10:07:13 | Re: Timestamp of insertion of the row. |