From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: host and hostssl equivalence in pg_hba.conf |
Date: | 2003-06-10 15:55:33 |
Message-ID: | 200306101555.h5AFtXk23115@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> How do people feel about changing matching for host and hostssl to be such that
> a plain host line in pg_hba.conf does not allow a SSL connection but requires
> the hostssl specifier?
>
> I had been going to submit a very small patch to do this but then it occurred
> to me this was a good candidate for a GUC along the lines of
> allow_host_hostssl_equivalence (just a name picked out of the air for this
> post). As this is a little bit more work and I can't get to anoncvs to refresh
> my tree I thought I'd check if it was something to persue or forget.
The other problem with using GUC here is that is adds even more
complexity to pg_bha.conf, where the meaning of 'host' changes depending
on postgresql.conf, and as Tom pointed out, it doesn't give per-host
control. I do think we need an additional host* line in pg_hba.conf for
this.
The real killer is that folks are getting SSL when they don't even know
it just because their client binaries/server are ssl.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paulo Jan | 2003-06-10 16:39:49 | Index not being used in MAX function (7.2.3) |
Previous Message | Henrik Steffen | 2003-06-10 15:20:25 | Re: update phenomenon - solved |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-06-10 16:55:03 | Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-10 15:45:01 | Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II |