Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-10 15:45:01
Message-ID: 200306101545.h5AFj1X22305@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > > Hey, I'm looking at the postgresql.conf.sample in CVS, and can't find the
> > > option that's supposed to let you turn off "Inserting missing FROM clause for
> > > table ..."
> >
> > Bruce hasn't applied that patch yet. I believe he's starting to catch
> > up the patch backlog today, though.
> >
>
> Are you sure about that? I seem to remember seeing the "will be applied within
> 24 hours" message a couple of weeks or so ago now. Is this a feature of the
> recent system problems and lost patches are having to be reapplied?
>
> As for it's name Josh, sorry, I don't have a record of my patch and the name
> used in the patch differs to that which I have in my source tree.

Yes, it is in the queue:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

Because of my Win32 work, I couldn't follow the 24/48 hours limit.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-10 15:55:33 Re: host and hostssl equivalence in pg_hba.conf
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-10 15:00:07 Re: [HACKERS] SAP and MySQL ... [and Benchmark]