From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael A Nachbaur <mike(at)nachbaur(dot)com> |
Cc: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <rmallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication for a large database |
Date: | 2003-05-08 01:28:13 |
Message-ID: | 20030507222653.T728@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Postgres-R is not pgsql.com's product ... eRServer is ... the code that is
in product has been quite extensively pounded on by both the .org and
.info registries ...
On Mon, 5 May 2003, Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> IIRC, pgsql.com's product (Postgres-R I think it's called) is based on
> PostgreSQL-6.4.2, which won't work for me since I use a lot of features
> available only in the 7.x generation.
>
> I'm using the Rserv code from the contrib section of Postgres, and that's what
> I'm having problems with.
>
> On Monday 05 May 2003 10:30 am, Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:
> > Have u tried the Rserv solution which pgsql.com provides
> > commercially? I have heard its pretty good.
> >
> >
> > regds
> > mallah.
> >
> > On Mon, 5 May 2003, Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I apologize if this has already been covered in the past, but I couldn't
> > > seem to find an adequate solution to my problem in the archives.
> > >
> > > I have a database that is used for a bandwidth tracking system at a
> > > broadband ISP. To make a long story short, I'm inserting over 800,000
> > > records per day into this database. Suffice to say, the uptime of this
> > > database is of paramount importance, so I would like to have a more
> > > up-to-date backup copy of my database in the event of a failure (more
> > > recent than my twice-per-day db_dump backup).
> > >
> > > I have two servers, both Dual Xeon-2G with 4G of RAM, and would like to
> > > replicate between the two. I would like to have "live" replication, but
> > > I couldn't seem to find a solution for that for PostgreSQL. I tried
> > > RServ but, after attempting it, I saw a mailing list posting saying that
> > > it is more-or-less useless for databases that have a large number of
> > > inserts (like mine).
> > >
> > > When I perform a replication after a batch of data is inserted, the query
> > > runs literally for hours before it returns. I have never actually been
> > > present during the whole replication duration since it takes longer than
> > > my 8-12 hour days here at work.
> > >
> > > Is there any replication solution that would fit my needs? I'm taking
> > > advantage of some PG7.2 features so "downgrading" to the 6.x version of
> > > postgres that has replication support isn't an option.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > --man
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bryan Klimt | 2003-05-08 02:23:17 | insert rowtype |
Previous Message | Kenny Mok | 2003-05-08 00:59:49 | Type coercion on column in a query |