From: | Michael A Nachbaur <mike(at)nachbaur(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <rmallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Replication for a large database |
Date: | 2003-05-05 19:28:45 |
Message-ID: | 200305051228.45404.mike@nachbaur.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
IIRC, pgsql.com's product (Postgres-R I think it's called) is based on
PostgreSQL-6.4.2, which won't work for me since I use a lot of features
available only in the 7.x generation.
I'm using the Rserv code from the contrib section of Postgres, and that's what
I'm having problems with.
On Monday 05 May 2003 10:30 am, Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:
> Have u tried the Rserv solution which pgsql.com provides
> commercially? I have heard its pretty good.
>
>
> regds
> mallah.
>
> On Mon, 5 May 2003, Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I apologize if this has already been covered in the past, but I couldn't
> > seem to find an adequate solution to my problem in the archives.
> >
> > I have a database that is used for a bandwidth tracking system at a
> > broadband ISP. To make a long story short, I'm inserting over 800,000
> > records per day into this database. Suffice to say, the uptime of this
> > database is of paramount importance, so I would like to have a more
> > up-to-date backup copy of my database in the event of a failure (more
> > recent than my twice-per-day db_dump backup).
> >
> > I have two servers, both Dual Xeon-2G with 4G of RAM, and would like to
> > replicate between the two. I would like to have "live" replication, but
> > I couldn't seem to find a solution for that for PostgreSQL. I tried
> > RServ but, after attempting it, I saw a mailing list posting saying that
> > it is more-or-less useless for databases that have a large number of
> > inserts (like mine).
> >
> > When I perform a replication after a batch of data is inserted, the query
> > runs literally for hours before it returns. I have never actually been
> > present during the whole replication duration since it takes longer than
> > my 8-12 hour days here at work.
> >
> > Is there any replication solution that would fit my needs? I'm taking
> > advantage of some PG7.2 features so "downgrading" to the 6.x version of
> > postgres that has replication support isn't an option.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --man
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-05-05 19:45:18 | Re: 2 simple SQL questions: optimizing aggegate query |
Previous Message | Michael A Nachbaur | 2003-05-05 19:26:35 | Re: Replication for a large database |