Re: 4 billion + oids

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Andrew Bartley <abartley(at)evolvosystems(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 4 billion + oids
Date: 2003-03-25 02:32:41
Message-ID: 20030325023241.GB6247@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:43:57AM +1100, Andrew Bartley wrote:

> 3.reduce number of tables,indexes etc.
> pros - less chance of oid clash
> cons - application may require high number of tables,indexes etc.
>
> Re: our application problem, the cons for solutions 2/3 are
> significant so as to prevent them being used in our application.

Note that you probably need to REINDEX the table pg_class if you use too
much temp tables.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La gente vulgar solo piensa en pasar el tiempo;
el que tiene talento, en aprovecharlo"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-03-25 03:02:48 Re: Retrieving database schema
Previous Message Karen Grose 2003-03-25 01:29:28 Re: Non Identifying Foreign Key Relationships