| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Key88 SF <key88sf(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PQescapeBytea on Win32 |
| Date: | 2003-03-22 18:49:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200303221849.h2MIneA23974@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Doesn't this duplicate a function that we already invented for PQnotify
> >> structs?
>
> > What do you recommend? Do we depricate PQfreeNotify?
>
> I dunno. In hindsight it was shortsightedly named. But I don't suppose
> we want to tell people to use "PQfreeNotify" to free the result of
> PQescapeBytea ... so deprecation seems to be the order of the day.
>
> Do we really want "PQfreemem" either? Maybe it should be "PQfree"?
I am a little concerned that PQfree would be confused with PQclear.
Could we have PQfreeNotify() be a macro to PQfreemem in 7.4?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-22 18:54:18 | Re: PQescapeBytea on Win32 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-22 18:21:19 | Re: PQescapeBytea on Win32 |