From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: XML ouput for psql |
Date: | 2003-03-17 23:08:12 |
Message-ID: | 200303172308.h2HN8CY20689@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I like the idea of doing XML in psql --- it seems like a natural place
> > for it.
>
> Not really; what of applications other than shell scripts that would
> like to get XML-formatted output?
>
> There was some talk in the FE/BE protocol thread of adding hooks to
> support more than one output format from the backend. Much of the
> infrastructure already exists (see DestReceiver in the backend); we
> just need an agreement on the protocol. On the whole I'd rather see
> it done that way than burying the logic in psql.
Well, programs can run psql using popen. It seems overkill to get the
protocol involved, specially since it is output-only. I can't imagine
who would bother with the wire protocol messiness just to get xml.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-17 23:18:49 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-17 22:59:15 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-17 23:18:49 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-17 22:59:15 | Re: XML ouput for psql |