Re: XML ouput for psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XML ouput for psql
Date: 2003-03-17 23:18:49
Message-ID: 12389.1047943129@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not really; what of applications other than shell scripts that would
>> like to get XML-formatted output?

> Well, programs can run psql using popen. It seems overkill to get the
> protocol involved, specially since it is output-only. I can't imagine
> who would bother with the wire protocol messiness just to get xml.

Having to popen a psql isn't overkill? This seems like a far messier
solution than the other. Furthermore, it's just plain not an available
solution in many scenarios (think of a Java program running JDBC; it may
not have privileges to do popen, and may not have access to a copy of
psql anyway).

If we were not already opening up the protocol for changes, I'd be
resistant to the idea too. But since we are, I think it should be fixed
where it's cleanest to fix it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-17 23:47:28 Re: XML ouput for psql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-17 23:08:12 Re: XML ouput for psql

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-17 23:47:28 Re: XML ouput for psql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-17 23:08:12 Re: XML ouput for psql